Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
VIP
OSA Radio
Chat
0
Features
Tunes
Mixes
Events
Flyers
Forums
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Welcome to Old Skool Anthems
The Old Skool Resource. Since 1998.
Join now
NATIVE INTERNET WEB RADIO PLAYER PLUGIN FOR SHOUTCAST, ICECAST AND RADIONOMY
powered by
Sodah Webdesign Mainz
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Aston Vill-ha ha-ha . Simmz, Shooms etc...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="woody" data-source="post: 590078" data-attributes="member: 7"><p>i agree totally about the debt / glazers! i would rather be as we were 2 years ago than owned by them and riddled with debt, but whats done is done and i will always support my team through thick and thin. The only small glimmer of hope is that there is no possible way that they can be in it for a quick buck.. If the figures bandied about are correct then it beggars belief that any banks and manchester united would have agreed to the deal in the first place, but even if they are correct, then they must have had some sort of business plan showing how they were goin to cover payments and the like... they are successful business men and i doubt they would take on something like this if they didnt know what they were doing. </p><p>In reality, if the figures are correct then unless we win every premiership champions league and fa cup every single year not to mention squillions of overpriced merchandise sales, then we could very well go the same way as Leeds (scum) <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>On the chelsea side of it.. If it wasnt United im damn sure you'd prefer a team to make its own money through shirt sales, gate receipts and on the field success' than a club with no history, & shit support to be suddenly handed a bottomless pit of cash because their new mafia owner wants to play god :S i know which id prefer, regardless of the team it was</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="woody, post: 590078, member: 7"] i agree totally about the debt / glazers! i would rather be as we were 2 years ago than owned by them and riddled with debt, but whats done is done and i will always support my team through thick and thin. The only small glimmer of hope is that there is no possible way that they can be in it for a quick buck.. If the figures bandied about are correct then it beggars belief that any banks and manchester united would have agreed to the deal in the first place, but even if they are correct, then they must have had some sort of business plan showing how they were goin to cover payments and the like... they are successful business men and i doubt they would take on something like this if they didnt know what they were doing. In reality, if the figures are correct then unless we win every premiership champions league and fa cup every single year not to mention squillions of overpriced merchandise sales, then we could very well go the same way as Leeds (scum) :P On the chelsea side of it.. If it wasnt United im damn sure you'd prefer a team to make its own money through shirt sales, gate receipts and on the field success' than a club with no history, & shit support to be suddenly handed a bottomless pit of cash because their new mafia owner wants to play god :S i know which id prefer, regardless of the team it was [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Aston Vill-ha ha-ha . Simmz, Shooms etc...
Top
Bottom