Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
VIP
OSA Radio
Chat
0
Features
Tunes
Mixes
Events
Flyers
Forums
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Welcome to Old Skool Anthems
The Old Skool Resource. Since 1998.
Join now
NATIVE INTERNET WEB RADIO PLAYER PLUGIN FOR SHOUTCAST, ICECAST AND RADIONOMY
powered by
Sodah Webdesign Mainz
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Bin laden is dead
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jiglo" data-source="post: 822129" data-attributes="member: 3953"><p>It's a radical idea, but if it would work in preventing terrorist from risking future attacks because they'll never reach heaven, then I would be in favour of it. But i'd agree it's more likely to inflame moderates, so i'd agree it's probably not the best idea<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/classics/thumbsup.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":thumbsup:" title="thumbs up :thumbsup:" data-shortname=":thumbsup:" /> </p><p></p><p>As for propaganda and documentaries, it's much like a magicians bag of tricks. It's all about convincing viewers into believing what they are seeing is real and i've seen a lot of shite that guillible viewers will buy into no questions asked. I know governments are corrupt and I know conspiracy theorists will use every trick in the book to convince you into believing there side of the story too, but there doesn't always have to be an alternate agenda, especially when something like this could backfire so badly and jeopardise their world standing.</p><p></p><p>The weapons of mass destruction story damaged the US and UK's standing in the world pretty badly. That's a bloody good reason why they wouldn't want a repeat of that event.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jiglo, post: 822129, member: 3953"] It's a radical idea, but if it would work in preventing terrorist from risking future attacks because they'll never reach heaven, then I would be in favour of it. But i'd agree it's more likely to inflame moderates, so i'd agree it's probably not the best idea:thumbsup: As for propaganda and documentaries, it's much like a magicians bag of tricks. It's all about convincing viewers into believing what they are seeing is real and i've seen a lot of shite that guillible viewers will buy into no questions asked. I know governments are corrupt and I know conspiracy theorists will use every trick in the book to convince you into believing there side of the story too, but there doesn't always have to be an alternate agenda, especially when something like this could backfire so badly and jeopardise their world standing. The weapons of mass destruction story damaged the US and UK's standing in the world pretty badly. That's a bloody good reason why they wouldn't want a repeat of that event. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Bin laden is dead
Top
Bottom
