Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
VIP
OSA Radio
Chat
0
Features
Tunes
Mixes
Events
Flyers
Forums
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Welcome to Old Skool Anthems
The Old Skool Resource. Since 1998.
Join now
NATIVE INTERNET WEB RADIO PLAYER PLUGIN FOR SHOUTCAST, ICECAST AND RADIONOMY
powered by
Sodah Webdesign Mainz
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Bullsht Facts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="U31" data-source="post: 816628" data-attributes="member: 8996"><p>Monty, apply the same James Randi debunking logic to the moon landings, </p><p>The evidence in our possession could be faked, i.e the artefacts brought back from the first landings (cameras and such left on the moon) and then dissected to study micrometeor impacts, who is to say that was actually on the moon, we have to put that down to faith.</p><p>The moon rocks could have come from the Antarctic, where a lot of moon material is found after it enters our atmosphere after asteroid strikes cause an ejection of lunar material.</p><p>The lunar dust on artefacts such as suits equipment and pictures could be ground up rock found in the Antarctic. </p><p></p><p>But What cant be faked?</p><p>Radio telemetry. There is no way that with all the receiving stations on Earth locked on to the command module and LAM, that the true location of the signals could be hoaxed, or even sent to recive/ transmit station planted on the moon in an unmanned robotic mission. The Uplink would be evident. Simple triangulation proves the source of the broadcasts</p><p></p><p>The Cold war.</p><p>Russia was in a major arms and technology Dick war with NATO at the time, and you can bet your sweet arse that all manor of eavesdropping devices were ranged on the missions, hoping for a fuck up to spread all over TASS in a news of the world styleee expose on how the Capitalist Dogs failed spectacularly. </p><p></p><p>Capricorn One was just fillum, Not a documentary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="U31, post: 816628, member: 8996"] Monty, apply the same James Randi debunking logic to the moon landings, The evidence in our possession could be faked, i.e the artefacts brought back from the first landings (cameras and such left on the moon) and then dissected to study micrometeor impacts, who is to say that was actually on the moon, we have to put that down to faith. The moon rocks could have come from the Antarctic, where a lot of moon material is found after it enters our atmosphere after asteroid strikes cause an ejection of lunar material. The lunar dust on artefacts such as suits equipment and pictures could be ground up rock found in the Antarctic. But What cant be faked? Radio telemetry. There is no way that with all the receiving stations on Earth locked on to the command module and LAM, that the true location of the signals could be hoaxed, or even sent to recive/ transmit station planted on the moon in an unmanned robotic mission. The Uplink would be evident. Simple triangulation proves the source of the broadcasts The Cold war. Russia was in a major arms and technology Dick war with NATO at the time, and you can bet your sweet arse that all manor of eavesdropping devices were ranged on the missions, hoping for a fuck up to spread all over TASS in a news of the world styleee expose on how the Capitalist Dogs failed spectacularly. Capricorn One was just fillum, Not a documentary. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Bullsht Facts
Top
Bottom
