Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
VIP
OSA Radio
Chat
0
Features
Tunes
Mixes
Events
Flyers
Forums
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Welcome to Old Skool Anthems
The Old Skool Resource. Since 1998.
Join now
NATIVE INTERNET WEB RADIO PLAYER PLUGIN FOR SHOUTCAST, ICECAST AND RADIONOMY
powered by
Sodah Webdesign Mainz
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Stanton ST 150 MK2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jigsaw" data-source="post: 919415" data-attributes="member: 46605"><p>I have not used technics for over 19 years so to make any comment on them would be unfair, but I do have memory of them not been easy to use and did not mix perfectly all the time.</p><p></p><p>I have read online people saying the stantons hold the beat for ages they have gone to the toilet and when they have come back they still have held the beat perfectly. </p><p></p><p>I find that some records you can just let play and they don't lose the beat you might have to just tap the platter once in a while to keep them in.So that suggest that their is nothing wrong with the flutter.</p><p></p><p>I do find like you I have keep my finger on the side to keep the timing in. The spindle things does not work on mine as their is to much power in the motor. </p><p></p><p>Mostly after mixing I come away with a nunb finger as the amount time I spend keep putting my finger on the platter to keep them in time. But this is the way I beat match as well I have to keep tapping the platter to get them to sincrinized beat, but I would do this if I had technics it's just the way I learned to mix, </p><p></p><p>I could save up another £400 to buy a pair of technics but am not sure they would be better and probably would be disappointed. Their is nothing on line I have read that suggest one is better than the other.</p><p></p><p>I have had no technical issue with mine as yet </p><p></p><p>I know I use to get frustrated with my technics as much as I do my stantons so that suggests that both are hard to mix on.</p><p></p><p>I really don't want to waste £400 to find out that they are no better were that money could be spent else were.</p><p></p><p>I have seen videos on line of people mixing with technics and they still have to twist the spindle to get them to mix only a person with some technics could reply to this thread and say that most of the time they can let the record go and it mixes perfectly, that is the only way of knowing.</p><p></p><p>I don't know how old the first genration stantons are now but some of the flutter issues might be down to them needing a service they are old now and am guessing both our stantons need a good service.</p><p></p><p>I got about 5 record today to mix perfectly with out doing anything they just held the beat. I think it's just beats on the records that change and not their is something wrong with the flutter on the turntable. That's why you have to tap the platter or twist the spindle.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jigsaw, post: 919415, member: 46605"] I have not used technics for over 19 years so to make any comment on them would be unfair, but I do have memory of them not been easy to use and did not mix perfectly all the time. I have read online people saying the stantons hold the beat for ages they have gone to the toilet and when they have come back they still have held the beat perfectly. I find that some records you can just let play and they don't lose the beat you might have to just tap the platter once in a while to keep them in.So that suggest that their is nothing wrong with the flutter. I do find like you I have keep my finger on the side to keep the timing in. The spindle things does not work on mine as their is to much power in the motor. Mostly after mixing I come away with a nunb finger as the amount time I spend keep putting my finger on the platter to keep them in time. But this is the way I beat match as well I have to keep tapping the platter to get them to sincrinized beat, but I would do this if I had technics it's just the way I learned to mix, I could save up another £400 to buy a pair of technics but am not sure they would be better and probably would be disappointed. Their is nothing on line I have read that suggest one is better than the other. I have had no technical issue with mine as yet I know I use to get frustrated with my technics as much as I do my stantons so that suggests that both are hard to mix on. I really don't want to waste £400 to find out that they are no better were that money could be spent else were. I have seen videos on line of people mixing with technics and they still have to twist the spindle to get them to mix only a person with some technics could reply to this thread and say that most of the time they can let the record go and it mixes perfectly, that is the only way of knowing. I don't know how old the first genration stantons are now but some of the flutter issues might be down to them needing a service they are old now and am guessing both our stantons need a good service. I got about 5 record today to mix perfectly with out doing anything they just held the beat. I think it's just beats on the records that change and not their is something wrong with the flutter on the turntable. That's why you have to tap the platter or twist the spindle. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Stanton ST 150 MK2
Top
Bottom
