Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
VIP
OSA Radio
Chat
0
Features
Tunes
Mixes
Events
Flyers
Forums
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Welcome to Old Skool Anthems
The Old Skool Resource. Since 1998.
Join now
NATIVE INTERNET WEB RADIO PLAYER PLUGIN FOR SHOUTCAST, ICECAST AND RADIONOMY
powered by
Sodah Webdesign Mainz
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Stereo & Speakers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sheikh Yerbouti" data-source="post: 746765" data-attributes="member: 9093"><p>It's an inconclusive test because it's subjective.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I said "there you go again" because both scenarios you outlined were aimed at proving "an improvement" in sound. Which, as I pointed out, is completely subjective and therefore unprovable.</p><p></p><p>Whether something is "better" or not cannot be scientifically proved, but, to use the speaker cable example, you CAN prove higher quality signal transfer down a piece of wire, if you use a long enough piece.</p><p></p><p></p><p>LOL nope, I don't recall ever saying such a thing.</p><p></p><p></p><p>To which I'd suggest you get your eyes checked as well as your ears.</p><p>Better quality cables are not guaranteed to give improvements, and may not yield improvements in all cases, but in general terms the science which backs up the claims has factual merit.</p><p>Your statement of "it's all bollocks" is, in fact, bollocks <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>There you go again <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/classics/thumbsup.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":thumbsup:" title="thumbs up :thumbsup:" data-shortname=":thumbsup:" /> (see above for explanation of why I said that).</p><p>This time I quoted your full sentence.</p><p>ROFL.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sheikh Yerbouti, post: 746765, member: 9093"] It's an inconclusive test because it's subjective. I said "there you go again" because both scenarios you outlined were aimed at proving "an improvement" in sound. Which, as I pointed out, is completely subjective and therefore unprovable. Whether something is "better" or not cannot be scientifically proved, but, to use the speaker cable example, you CAN prove higher quality signal transfer down a piece of wire, if you use a long enough piece. LOL nope, I don't recall ever saying such a thing. To which I'd suggest you get your eyes checked as well as your ears. Better quality cables are not guaranteed to give improvements, and may not yield improvements in all cases, but in general terms the science which backs up the claims has factual merit. Your statement of "it's all bollocks" is, in fact, bollocks :D There you go again ;) :thumbsup: (see above for explanation of why I said that). This time I quoted your full sentence. ROFL. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Stereo & Speakers
Top
Bottom
