The Burning Glasgow Terrorists

Welcome to Old Skool Anthems
The Old Skool Resource. Since 1998.
Join now

the_ColaBoy

New member
May 26, 2002
134
0
0
Walmington-on-Sea
Ha ha... I don't like lemon on kebab meat! But I'd put salt and vinegar on that fecking twat! I hope he survives and they give him real wanky skin grafts... oh yeah, and that he gets a good beating daily!
 

Robbie Chopper

New member
Mar 23, 2006
579
1
0
50
On the mo-fo'in 1's and 2's
I used to be in the army and went to Northern Ireland twice so i know quite a bit about terrorism and bombings and stuff and all i can say is this.....


.......IT DOESNT WORK YOU FUCKIN PRICKS !!!! WE'RE NOT SCARED OF YOU, WE'RE NOT GONNA PULL OUT OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN JUST COS YOU SET A FEW BOMBS OFF IN ENGLAND AND MOST OF ALL........

YOU ARE NOT GOING TO PARRADICE YOU DUMB FUCKS, YOU ARE GONNA BURN IN HELL FOR ETERNITY.

right, got that off my chest, have a nice day folks :D
 

biggz

New member
Jul 9, 2006
1,010
0
0
51
wirral
speak robbie m8
but were was them yank fuckers when
the ira was bombing our shopping centers
probably funding um:mad:
 

zoom

New member
Mar 26, 2005
524
0
0
Its well known the Americans funded the IRA, Its also well known that America funded Osama Bin Laden to fight the Russians in Afghanistan. Now all of a sudden he's their scapegoat. The Americans have run 'false-flag' operations and killed their own people (like 9/11) to sway public opinion into backing wars for freedom. Its all bollocks. The sooner people wake up to this the better.

Ive just read on Sky News :

Quote "The Scottish hospital, where one of the Glasgow bombers is being held, was cordoned off as army disposal experts were called in to carry out a controlled explosion.

Strathclyde Police said they believed the car was connected to the attack at Glasgow airport on Saturday but did not contain explosives."

SO WHY BLOW IT UP THEN??? Could it not be used for forensic evidence? Of course it could, Thats why they blew it up to "conceal" the real purportrators i.e. MI5.

-DZ
 

ilovepiano

Active member
Jul 9, 2002
5,329
3
38
Yup and it's probably no coincidence that it's just after we have a got ourselves a new prime minister. We can have the media shovel the massive terrorist threat in our faces to scare us shitless so Mr Brown can step forward and be the brave hero telling everyone that what we need is ID cards, more CCTV, and more anti-terror laws.

*yawn*

Smell this...

139_nescafe.jpg





YouTube - Keith Olbermann & Larry Johnson - 6/29/07
 

Jonno

New member
Jul 15, 2001
4,592
3
0
53
Yup and it's probably no coincidence that it's just after we have a got ourselves a new prime minister. We can have the media shovel the massive terrorist threat in our faces to scare us shitless so Mr Brown can step forward and be the brave hero telling everyone that what we need is ID cards, more CCTV, and more anti-terror laws.
Are you seriously suggesting that the two chaps yesterday at Glasgow airport were government agents or something? They must be on one hell of a bonus to set themselves on fire :axe:

As for there not being a terrorist threat - what about the recent fertilizer bomb convictions or the chap from Blackburn who got 22 years in the past month or the failed 21/7 london bombers. Are they not real either because they are all looking at very long jail sentences - some of them even pleaded guilty!

I take it you haven't watched that BBC documentary on youtube. There's another good one I'd like to recommend - it's an episode of South Park called Mystery of the Urinal Deuce, it's very good at pulling apart the "retarded" logic behind conspiracy theories.

Are South Park part of the conspiracy :ghost:
 

Jonno

New member
Jul 15, 2001
4,592
3
0
53
:fekked:
Its well known the Americans funded the IRA, Its also well known that America funded Osama Bin Laden to fight the Russians in Afghanistan. Now all of a sudden he's their scapegoat. The Americans have run 'false-flag' operations and killed their own people (like 9/11) to sway public opinion into backing wars for freedom. Its all bollocks. The sooner people wake up to this the better.

Ive just read on Sky News :

Quote "The Scottish hospital, where one of the Glasgow bombers is being held, was cordoned off as army disposal experts were called in to carry out a controlled explosion.

Strathclyde Police said they believed the car was connected to the attack at Glasgow airport on Saturday but did not contain explosives."

SO WHY BLOW IT UP THEN??? Could it not be used for forensic evidence? Of course it could, Thats why they blew it up to "conceal" the real purportrators i.e. MI5.
The controlled explosion was for a possible suicide belt round the suspects waist not the car :axe:

Here are the facts whether you like them or not:

There is no evidence for a conspiracy on 9/11 or 7/7 or yesterday. FACT.

Not one single expert in the world thinks the twin towers were brought down by explosives. FACT.

Now if you can tell me why I should believe there was a conspiracy on 9/11 or 7/7 etc, when there is absolutely not a shred of evidence to back it up, then I'm all ears.
 

zoom

New member
Mar 26, 2005
524
0
0
Are you seriously suggesting that the two chaps yesterday at Glasgow airport were government agents or something?

No, proborbly 'expendable' agents who had been double crossed.

They must be on one hell of a bonus to set themselves on fire

Yes, 72 virgins in heaven.

what about the recent fertilizer bomb convictions or the chap from Blackburn who got 22 years in the past month or the failed 21/7 london bombers. Are they not real either because they are all looking at very long jail sentences - some of them even pleaded guilty!

My guess would be they dissapear 'convieniently' far away from these shores.

There's another good one I'd like to recommend - it's an episode of South Park

I grew out of cartoons a long time ago

-DZ
 

mrshifter

New member
Jan 20, 2005
415
0
0
50
Dodge City
Whilst I hope my Government wouldn't even contemplate setting up something like this I've thought right from Friday that something didn't sit right. It's all been a bit too convenient. The first Merc is found by an ambulanceman when he saw the Mercedes 'smoking'. What was smoking exactly :confused: Propane gas and petrol don't smoke. Interesting what the CIA guy was saying in that interview.

"it's gonna do a lot of damage to the interior of the Mercedes".

The police are saying that all the pieces are quickly falling into place. They've made numerous arrests up and down the country (none of whom are British conveniently), and seem to be tying the case up nicely.

Is this the same British police who normally take about three weeks to finds their arseholes with a mirror on a stick :S

I also wondered that if the terror threat in this country now stands at 'critical', how the future King of England and his brother can be allowed to have a big jolly up at Wembley Stadium with 63000 other people the day after a 'terror' attack at a British airport.
 

zoom

New member
Mar 26, 2005
524
0
0
The controlled explosion was for a possible suicide belt round the suspects waist not the car

So they left it in the carpark overnight, This was found yesterday evening & the hospital evacuated then. Not mid afternoon today.

There is no evidence for a conspiracy on 9/11 or 7/7

There are masses of evidence, not only from people interviewed on the day at ground zero who reported hearing explosions going on in the twin towers but, the fact the twin towers were closed 2 weeks prior to 9/11 by the CIA who had exclusive access to the buildings for no apparent reason. Theres many Alex Jones videos to keep you educated too.

Not one single expert in the world thinks the twin towers were brought down by explosives

So why did WTC building 7 collapse like a controlled demolition? Even the New York Mayor said he told his team to "pull the building" Now if theres a building to be "pulled" eg: demolished, it would take a couple of weeks to analyse the structure & place explosives, NOT A FEW HOURS!! the explosives were already there!! so if they were in WTC7, who's to say the CIA didn't take the time they had in the twin towers to do the same?

-DZ
 

Jonno

New member
Jul 15, 2001
4,592
3
0
53
C'mon then people just so you don't look like paranoid tin foil hat wearing loons - where is your evidence of a conspiracy yesterday or friday night or 9/11 or 7/7 or 21/7?

Just one piece of evidence will do. If you don't have any then I'm afraid, quite rightly, you can be labeled loons.

So cards on table - do you have any evidence of a conspiracy yes or no?
 

Jonno

New member
Jul 15, 2001
4,592
3
0
53
There are masses of evidence, not only from people interviewed on the day at ground zero who reported hearing explosions going on in the twin towers but, the fact the twin towers were closed 2 weeks prior to 9/11 by the CIA who had exclusive access to the buildings for no apparent reason. Theres many Alex Jones videos to keep you educated too.
If there is "masses" of evidence then it shouldn't be too difficult to produce some. Just one piece. Make it your best piece of irrefutable evidence that there was a conspiracy.

Incidentally I'm not interested in "watch this video" - that's not evidence. It's silly dramatic video's for playground theories which are disproven time and time again.

If the evidence is so compelling from these videos then please give me the very best piece from them.

Simple :)