Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
VIP
OSA Radio
Chat
0
Features
Tunes
Mixes
Events
Flyers
Forums
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Welcome to Old Skool Anthems
The Old Skool Resource. Since 1998.
Join now
NATIVE INTERNET WEB RADIO PLAYER PLUGIN FOR SHOUTCAST, ICECAST AND RADIONOMY
powered by
Sodah Webdesign Mainz
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Thoughts please...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sheikh Yerbouti" data-source="post: 772584" data-attributes="member: 9093"><p>This is the worst kind of sensationalistic gutter journalism which I despise.</p><p>"Mum fined..." hardly... they charged her for the time, sure, but it's hardly a "fine" is it.</p><p></p><p>Not saying I agree with it mind you cos I don't at all.</p><p></p><p>The funeral parlour (or crematorium or whatever) are in a difficult position though because if they didn't put some sort of limits or rules on this sort of thing, people would invariably take the piss.</p><p></p><p>The article doesn't say whether the woman was made aware of the charges at the time, which would seem like the simplest solution, although it would be incredibly delicate to handle...</p><p></p><p>IMO the crematorium or wherever should make some changes to their layout & their processes, to provide an area where people can go afterwards to grieve, with no charges or time limits or restrictions placed on them. Frankly I'm amazed if there isn't an area like that already. Most have them.</p><p></p><p>But I think you also have to take this article with a big pinch of salt, because it reeks of unscrupulous journalists spinning the facts to make them sound as bad as possible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sheikh Yerbouti, post: 772584, member: 9093"] This is the worst kind of sensationalistic gutter journalism which I despise. "Mum fined..." hardly... they charged her for the time, sure, but it's hardly a "fine" is it. Not saying I agree with it mind you cos I don't at all. The funeral parlour (or crematorium or whatever) are in a difficult position though because if they didn't put some sort of limits or rules on this sort of thing, people would invariably take the piss. The article doesn't say whether the woman was made aware of the charges at the time, which would seem like the simplest solution, although it would be incredibly delicate to handle... IMO the crematorium or wherever should make some changes to their layout & their processes, to provide an area where people can go afterwards to grieve, with no charges or time limits or restrictions placed on them. Frankly I'm amazed if there isn't an area like that already. Most have them. But I think you also have to take this article with a big pinch of salt, because it reeks of unscrupulous journalists spinning the facts to make them sound as bad as possible. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Thoughts please...
Top
Bottom