Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
VIP
OSA Radio
Chat
0
Features
Tunes
Mixes
Events
Flyers
Forums
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Welcome to Old Skool Anthems
The Old Skool Resource. Since 1998.
Join now
NATIVE INTERNET WEB RADIO PLAYER PLUGIN FOR SHOUTCAST, ICECAST AND RADIONOMY
powered by
Sodah Webdesign Mainz
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Undecided on who to vote for - try this...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PepeLePew" data-source="post: 800080" data-attributes="member: 4895"><p>Ditto.</p><p></p><p>Though I'm sure I read somewhere that war is the biggest employer of all time. </p><p>And I'm sure that man will never grow out of it's need to have wars to settle something or another. And all nations have umpteen numbers of ways to kill whoever they want to without resorting to a unprejudiced destroyer.</p><p></p><p>I would love to see all Nuclear warheads dissarmed - as ideal, naive and fanciful that may seem right now. I just don't see the point in any one or two (or 8/9) countries having a big red button that will not only anhialate their enemy but fuck up the planet for everyone and themselves. Even devleoping the weapons and maintaining them represents a major strain on the public coffers of even the richest nations. </p><p></p><p>I would propose that the knowledge and technology to develop nuclear weapons be shared globally; whilst dissarming all nations global warheads... what madness Kevin <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite9" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":eek:" /> </p><p></p><p>Prior to that I would like to see that the United Nations is strengthened, but not given tax raising powers (Not another EU). So that all countries are given a seat on a global council - the head being a representative of their government. With their vote share being proportional to the countries population. All members are there with the signed autority of the country they represent. With the understanding that countries governments that breach "no-brainers" can be removed or "taken out" by the UN.</p><p></p><p>"no-brainers" being development of nuclear weapons, declarations of war/acts of aggression taken without UN's consent, systematic build up of petty/minor/major acts not in the interests of the country or world.</p><p></p><p>How would this stop Iran; Al Qaeda; BNP acquiring the technology to develop Nuclear weapons. It wouldn't but there would be a better understanding globaly of what materials are banned and why. Which would enhance spy networks, to ensure any movements in prohibited items, are documented for a country to act upon. And they would then have to act upon it or face removal by the UN</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PepeLePew, post: 800080, member: 4895"] Ditto. Though I'm sure I read somewhere that war is the biggest employer of all time. And I'm sure that man will never grow out of it's need to have wars to settle something or another. And all nations have umpteen numbers of ways to kill whoever they want to without resorting to a unprejudiced destroyer. I would love to see all Nuclear warheads dissarmed - as ideal, naive and fanciful that may seem right now. I just don't see the point in any one or two (or 8/9) countries having a big red button that will not only anhialate their enemy but fuck up the planet for everyone and themselves. Even devleoping the weapons and maintaining them represents a major strain on the public coffers of even the richest nations. I would propose that the knowledge and technology to develop nuclear weapons be shared globally; whilst dissarming all nations global warheads... what madness Kevin :o Prior to that I would like to see that the United Nations is strengthened, but not given tax raising powers (Not another EU). So that all countries are given a seat on a global council - the head being a representative of their government. With their vote share being proportional to the countries population. All members are there with the signed autority of the country they represent. With the understanding that countries governments that breach "no-brainers" can be removed or "taken out" by the UN. "no-brainers" being development of nuclear weapons, declarations of war/acts of aggression taken without UN's consent, systematic build up of petty/minor/major acts not in the interests of the country or world. How would this stop Iran; Al Qaeda; BNP acquiring the technology to develop Nuclear weapons. It wouldn't but there would be a better understanding globaly of what materials are banned and why. Which would enhance spy networks, to ensure any movements in prohibited items, are documented for a country to act upon. And they would then have to act upon it or face removal by the UN [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Undecided on who to vote for - try this...
Top
Bottom
