Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
VIP
OSA Radio
Chat
0
Features
Tunes
Mixes
Events
Flyers
Forums
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Welcome to Old Skool Anthems
The Old Skool Resource. Since 1998.
Join now
NATIVE INTERNET WEB RADIO PLAYER PLUGIN FOR SHOUTCAST, ICECAST AND RADIONOMY
powered by
Sodah Webdesign Mainz
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Undecided on who to vote for - try this...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PepeLePew" data-source="post: 800248" data-attributes="member: 4895"><p>I'm not saying we don't need something - we already have untold other ways of creating misery for an enemy. And I'm sure we will never stop developing more.</p><p>And I'm not saying put the genie back in the bottle. I'm saying let it out of all 8/9 bottles.</p><p>But with the proviso that all countries recognise that they have a global responsibility never to develop or use them, by being bound to a global organisation that can act decisively against any that wish to swing the lead.</p><p></p><p>The world just seems far too small with ever dwindling resources to have any country or group of countries having the ability to use such a ridiculously globally destructive weapon as means of asserting power. The thing with bigger weapons is that it only creates peace on your terms for a short time whilst the competition catches up.</p><p></p><p>I do wonder if CERN manages to identify some new even more powerful material, whether one of the European powers might try to create it for themselves. Thus sparking a new arms race.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PepeLePew, post: 800248, member: 4895"] I'm not saying we don't need something - we already have untold other ways of creating misery for an enemy. And I'm sure we will never stop developing more. And I'm not saying put the genie back in the bottle. I'm saying let it out of all 8/9 bottles. But with the proviso that all countries recognise that they have a global responsibility never to develop or use them, by being bound to a global organisation that can act decisively against any that wish to swing the lead. The world just seems far too small with ever dwindling resources to have any country or group of countries having the ability to use such a ridiculously globally destructive weapon as means of asserting power. The thing with bigger weapons is that it only creates peace on your terms for a short time whilst the competition catches up. I do wonder if CERN manages to identify some new even more powerful material, whether one of the European powers might try to create it for themselves. Thus sparking a new arms race. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Undecided on who to vote for - try this...
Top
Bottom