Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
VIP
OSA Radio
Chat
0
Features
Tunes
Mixes
Events
Flyers
Forums
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
What's new
Members
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Welcome to Old Skool Anthems
The Old Skool Resource. Since 1998.
Join now
NATIVE INTERNET WEB RADIO PLAYER PLUGIN FOR SHOUTCAST, ICECAST AND RADIONOMY
powered by
Sodah Webdesign Mainz
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Was 91-92 the Optimum for our 'era'?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="siman91" data-source="post: 817467" data-attributes="member: 755"><p>One thing I have learnt is that OSA is a broad church with people loving their early beats and disco through to todays music (pitty them!!)</p><p></p><p>I broadly agree with your statement as I started out in 89 and finished say 96ish with only occasional nights out 96 onwards.</p><p></p><p>The music has changed massivly as the technology changed, me I love the analogue sounds, early digital TB303, TR 909's etc etc. I did live the scene from 91 to 94 and did fall deeply into the hardcore and early progressive scene. However the take over by the pop culture killed it for me. </p><p></p><p>I would also say that the people changed as did the atmousphere in 93 ish with more money, mags like mixmag and high level artists wanting a bit...U2 etc dragging the scene from underground to mainstream. I used to love not being the normal and being underground.</p><p></p><p>I realy respect views like Julians</p><p></p><p>.....I think everything after 93 is overated crap and get more pleasure masturbating with sandpaper..... </p><p></p><p>We all look back with a smile on our faces. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p>S</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="siman91, post: 817467, member: 755"] One thing I have learnt is that OSA is a broad church with people loving their early beats and disco through to todays music (pitty them!!) I broadly agree with your statement as I started out in 89 and finished say 96ish with only occasional nights out 96 onwards. The music has changed massivly as the technology changed, me I love the analogue sounds, early digital TB303, TR 909's etc etc. I did live the scene from 91 to 94 and did fall deeply into the hardcore and early progressive scene. However the take over by the pop culture killed it for me. I would also say that the people changed as did the atmousphere in 93 ish with more money, mags like mixmag and high level artists wanting a bit...U2 etc dragging the scene from underground to mainstream. I used to love not being the normal and being underground. I realy respect views like Julians .....I think everything after 93 is overated crap and get more pleasure masturbating with sandpaper..... We all look back with a smile on our faces. :D S [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Music
The Chillout Room
Was 91-92 the Optimum for our 'era'?
Top
Bottom
