Sorry but i disagree. Of course there were shit tunes back in the day. It being a particularly great time as far as new music goes does not, and cannot, detract from the fact that there was still inevitably shit tunes being made/released- there always is. You might not agree with what i or the next man class as shit- but hey thats life. Your argument prior to this was that its the drugs that have gone giz- and as a consequence people's opinions of some tunes have changed- an issue which i have already answered.
People evolve musically throughout their life. What i might have thought as a right beast aged 14 when i had very little exposure might have become cheesy nonsense a year later when i had the luxury of better quality music. This has nothing to do with drugs, its about refining tastes. In a similar way to someone looking attractive when you’re wearing beer goggles- so can some tunes sound good when you're off your head- hence my point about a shit tune going back to being shit when sober (regardless of strength of tab). I find it odd that you fail to recognise that perhaps people have always disliked the mentioned records, even when they first came out, so unless you establish whether this to be the case or not your rationale is pretty weak.
A valid point and one which i agreed with hence leaving it out of my reply last time.
I fail to see what this has to do with what people personally find aurally sound or unsound. Again your complicating this with coming at it from a temporal and drug slant. A shit tune is a shit tune to some end of.
I have no idea what you mean by this senny
.
In a nutshell, your argument is that its simply the same great tunes all along, and its actually people's perceptions that have changed due to lower quality drugs. Imo, this is total nonsense- as is your comment re: never having had a 'proper' night out unless its on the old style e's. The reasons for me thinking so have already been given.
